首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparative study of the mechanical properties of wool and alpaca fibres
【2h】

A comparative study of the mechanical properties of wool and alpaca fibres

机译:羊毛和羊驼毛纤维力学性能的比较研究

摘要

This study reports the latest research into alpaca and wool fibres. In particular, those properties that have received little attention in research literature have been examined. They include single fibre abrasion and bending fatigue, single fibre tensile properties, as well as resistance to compression behaviour. These properties are important because they affect the softness and pilling propensity of these fibres and the resultant fabrics. Clean wool and alpaca fibres were used in this study. Fibre abrasion/bending fatigue measurements were carried out using a Textechno FIBRESTRESS instrument. The resistance to compression (RtC) tests were carried out according to Australian Standard AS3535-1988. The results indicate that wool and alpaca fibres behave quite differently, even though both fibre types are of animal origin. Wool fibre resistance to compression decreases as fibre diameter increases while the opposite appears to occur for alpaca fibres. For both wool and alpaca the number of abrasion/bending cycles at fibre break increases with an increase in fibre diameter, it takes longer to break the alpaca fibres. Reasons for these differences have been postulated based on differences in fibre surface and structure between alpaca and wool.
机译:这项研究报告了羊驼毛和羊毛纤维的最新研究。特别地,已经研究了在研究文献中很少受到关注的那些性质。它们包括单纤维的磨损和弯曲疲劳,单纤维的拉伸性能以及抗压缩性能。这些性质很重要,因为它们会影响这些纤维和所得织物的柔软性和起球倾向。在这项研究中使用了干净的羊毛和羊驼毛纤维。使用Textechno FIBRESTRESS仪器进行纤维磨损/弯曲疲劳测量。根据澳大利亚标准AS3535-1988进行了抗压强度(RtC)测试。结果表明,羊毛和羊驼毛纤维的行为差异很大,即使两种纤维都是动物来源的。羊毛纤维抗压缩性随纤维直径的增加而降低,而羊驼毛纤维则相反。对于羊毛和羊驼毛,纤维断裂时的磨损/弯曲循环次数随纤维直径的增加而增加,使羊驼毛纤维断裂所需的时间更长。根据羊驼毛和羊毛之间纤维表面和结构的差异,推测了产生这些差异的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号